tag 605120 + moreinfo thanks [ would you please wrap your lines at a sane amount? Like at 72 chars max.? ]
Hi, On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:03:19PM +0000, Alexis PM wrote: > tag 605120 + moreinfo Why? This just says "it needs more info", which you didn't provide. > > This BTS is *not* for bugs on bpo versions. > > > > Does that also happen with squeeze/sids version? > > > > If this bug tracking system isn't for backports, which is? Mailing debian-backpo...@lists.d.o, as bpo doesn't have a BTS. > Because the package in Backports is the same as in Squeeze nope. squeeze is 2 versions ahead ;) > (but compiled for Lenny), so I guess that the bug pointed also be present at > Squeeze Maybe, yes. My question was more aimed at wanting to know whether it also happens there because I don't run OOo 3.2.1 anymore... (but LibO, see below) > (though I do not use testing and therefore I can not confirm it), so I think > it is important also to pay attention to bugs in Backports. didn't say it is not (if you read the ml archive I actually fixed a bug based on a report from bpo). If I didn't pay attention at all I would not want more info :) > > Even if that was confirmed, we're in a hard freeze for > > squeeze (and thus for OOo 3.2.1, which the backport > > you use is from). So this won't be fixed anymore, given > > that it's not a release- critical bug. > > That isn't a critical bug and Squeeze is in hard freeze, but OOo is a > important package for desktop users and it is a important bug (OOo Impress is > a presentation software and this bug seriously affects usability of the > software). Yeah, but as you say it's not critical, so... > > It would also be interesting whether LibreOffice 3.3 is > > affected, too... And this isn't answered (which the moreinfo was about). If we had a fix there, we could backport it if the release team would approve it... Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
