Hi, On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, dave b wrote: > Sir, I think you should be more polite: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=5726
Please don't dig old mails to justify your assertion. He was trying to be polite (even if it was not obvious to you). > I was simply voicing what I thought as a user of debian. > I know this bug report is *technical*. I was making a *technical* comment. Ian might not have understood you correctly. Ian, Dave was saying that having the defaults in gcc was good since it also protected custom binaries compiled by users and not only binaries in official Debian packages. It's certainly an aspect that the technical committee ought to consider in the balance. > Also, note I did not reply to the list did I ? I reassigned the bug to the technical committee so any mail sent to the bug is also sent to the list of the technical committee. That's why Ian saw your mail. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
