tags 586315 + pending thanks Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for lapack (versioned as 3.2.2-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -u lapack-3.2.2/debian/changelog lapack-3.2.2/debian/changelog --- lapack-3.2.2/debian/changelog +++ lapack-3.2.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +lapack (3.2.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Correctly remove alternative during package removal (Closes: #586315) + + -- Laurent Bigonville <bi...@debian.org> Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:42:36 +0100 + lapack (3.2.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -u lapack-3.2.2/debian/liblapack3gf.prerm lapack-3.2.2/debian/liblapack3gf.prerm --- lapack-3.2.2/debian/liblapack3gf.prerm +++ lapack-3.2.2/debian/liblapack3gf.prerm @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ if [ "$1" != "upgrade" ] then - update-alternatives --remove liblapack.so.3gf /usr/lib/liblapack/liblapack.so.3gf + update-alternatives --remove liblapack.so.3gf /usr/lib/lapack/liblapack.so.3gf fi #DEBHELPER# -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist
