On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:13:20 +0100 (CET), "Daniel Hokka Zakrisson" <dan...@hozac.com> wrote:
> What dietlibc version was used to build the binaries? Does it have > http://people.linux-vserver.org/~dhozac/p/m/delta-dietdirent-fix01.diff > applied? IIRC this was one way that problem exhibited itself. Looking at the build logs for sparc, it looks like 0.32-5 of dietlibc was used. Looking at the debian source for that version of dietlibc, and comparing it to the patch you reference, no it was not applied. That patch is odd, all it does is move the int below the char buf[PAGE_SIZE-(sizeof (int)*3)]; what is going on there? micah
pgprNjfUhafn1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
