-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 15/11/2010 20:47, Marcos Marado wrote: > So, here it is. After this I think that there are no reasons to decide > something regarding this issue: either to pick up back the effort of > packaging moon without bundling mono, drop amd64 support or drop the whole > package...
It's not AMD64 specific. It's entirely unbuildable as-is on any architecture. The Firefox plugin API has changed too much, and there's no relationship between the current plugin code in Moonlight and the version in Debian, so patching's out. 3.0 upstream should be slightly more realistic, requiring a bundle of a limited subset of the mono-2-6 branch rather than the whole thing. Alternatively, once Mono 2.8 hits the archive, it goes from being a matter of "it'd be a huge pain in the ass to keep an unmaintainable tens-of-thousands-of-lines diff" unbundling, to a somewhat more unreasonable "it-wont-build-without-millions-of-lines-of-reverts diff". Which would make the case for bundling somewhat clearer. And I'd like to remind Joerg that chromium-browser was allowed in when it bundles over 40 external libraries, not least of which is ffmpeg. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM4disAAoJEMkPnLkOH60MSNkIAKnpeYg76bXVb/ee+Vg737Sh QlXpajT1WadBngoytxYRzxddgcw4hu3EpP26s4Qih4SepR5u3k5bLkQv2eOFLBGk m6cjGy3fvSYpvRsKAntkI2RByOthKerhHVgY0wRP4vChmcgh9TBYTiU9UFAIeKtk Wnv1c0L935KKhpHkTjqNweGwSfY+CWEXZVstkSAhleVY0SxgN22MnrRjh+PX/g2W 5neej2JPChoR4OsbKksEm0g85SbzOPVd5mT+mIYLhrw2ZgMEm9lnpAJZ4dUXPsCm grEl2aULFlk0klVLi7RHkUbPJbBJyutKDdPn6UV4CwvBSq62u3/as0jEVZhE+ZI= =gRkj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
