-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
I have mixed feelings here. At the same time, I want to say sorry for insisting so much, and I feel I'm a jerk to do so. But at the same time I don't feel happy about the final outcome, just because of a timing issue, and I know the package is in good shape. :/ Yes, there is backports.d.o. No, it's not the same as being in stable (I would have use b.d.o anyway, this is removing the possibility to have 2 branches in stable at the same time, so people can choose). As it stands, it's unreasonable to even try working on the 0.30.x branch for Squeeze, given the short amount of time remaining. I feel very sad about it, but as there's no way to convince the RT that the 0.32.x branch is in a very good shape for Squeeze (my users can tell it is...), I have to ask for the removal of src:dtc from testing. Please proceed if there's no way to change your mind about unblocking. Thomas Goirand (zigo) P.S: If there is room for reconsidering the decision (which I do not believe given the current thread), yes, 0.32.5-1 in SID is stable and ready, and I still believe unblocking it is the way to go. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkzYDZAACgkQl4M9yZjvmkmPpwCfZs0XIIpMvqqEUcntJYDbFyiI wSYAnAuHvMVnBYjJtrJb5LKt8b1EBNVn =iH3y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
