On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 22:39 +0200, Daniel Dehennin wrote: > Arthur de Jong <adej...@debian.org> writes: > > > Hi, just to give you a heads up on this issue I'm afraid we are too late > > for squeeze since it is frozen now. I'm sorry but haven't had time to > > look into this before the freeze. > > > > I have some other bugs in nss-pam-ldapd that I want to have fixed in > > squeeze first but after that I can probably address this in unstable > > (doing the change then also means there is more time to test it). > > Fine, I already use it and cfengine handle the configuration ;-)
I have been working on getting your SASL configuration patch integrated into the packaging (I'm aiming it for a 0.8 development release soonish). I'm now mostly happy with the .config and .postinst files but I think the .templates files has some issues still. The text is rather long and even lintian complains about the nslcd/ldap-sasl-mech and nslcd/ldap-sasl-secprops templates. Can you see if you have any improvements for the templates file? Perhaps some external reference can be included or we may have to assume that an administrator knows about the different SASL options? Perhaps it should be clearer what to do when you want to use Kerberos? Anyway, hope to hear from you on this! -- -- arthur - adej...@debian.org - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
