Your response was unclear to me. If it already has a versioned dependency, why shouldn't the dependency be tightened?
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Elimar Riesebieter <e.riesebie...@puz.de> wrote: > On Thu, 4 November 2010 11:53:01 -0400, Simon Ruggier wrote: >> The package ia32-libs_20101012 has the required libraries, while >> ia32-libs_20090808 does not. Shouldn't this mean that >> lib32asound2-plugins should depend on the newer version of ia32-libs? > > No, it doesn't. Versioned dependencies are not maintainable and > don't make sense, though. > > $ apt-cache show lib32asound2-plugins > Package: lib32asound2-plugins > [...] > Depends: ia32-libs (>= 20080808), lib32asound2 (>> 1.0.18), libc6-i386 (>= > 2.2) > [...] > > lib32asound2-plugins depends on the newest available ia32-libs > younger than 20080808. > > Elimar > > -- > BOFH excuse #126: > it has Intel Inside > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to 548983-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
