also sprach Sylvain Le Gall <gil...@debian.org> [2010.11.03.1838 +0100]: > I am not sure to understand what you ask. Hardlinks and copies are not > the same thing. AFAIU, if you hardlink a file to a different filename > and make a change to one of these files, it will also appear in the > other file. You don't have this effect with copies. If the remote file > is not an hardlink, there is no point making the local file an hardlink.
You are right. I guess what I am looking for is the ability to synchronise hardlinks with unison. Otoh, an option to hardlink identical files on either side of the sync might be useful. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong." -- voltaire
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
