On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 02:05:22AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > (w00t, what a delay…) > > Marc Brockschmidt <m...@marcbrockschmidt.de> (19/03/2010): > > Hum, this sounds weird. Are you sure that you are using the current > > packages from the buildd branch and *not* the released package? > > I'm sure I (am|was back then) using the released package, and *not* > packages from the buildd branch. That was for an incremental d-i > build, not for stuff on buildds; hence my using unstable's packages. > > > Since the upload to unstable, Modestas Vainius <mo...@debian.org> > > contributed patches to help work around this problem (by massaging > > aptitude to drag in more packages instead of giving up). > > I guess we'll see how it goes after the recent modification you made > for the recent aptitude configuration option change. Thanks for the > clarification about master vs. buildd branches anyway.
Hi guys, Just wanted to check if this bug Re: experimental building is still an issue, or if there were any changes still required? If not, can I close the bug? Thanks, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
