Karl Goetz wrote:
> Attached patch changes scripts/{sid,gutsy} to use tabs instead of mixed spaces
> and tabs.
> This allows diff to create a useful comparison of the files (and has revealed
> a couple of seemingly pointless differences).
Some I've resolved now. Leaving notably:
--- sid 2010-10-31 10:35:33.091309635 -0400
+++ gutsy 2010-10-31 10:35:33.091309635 -0400
@@ -110,7 +114,7 @@
x_core_install dpkg
if [ ! -e "$TARGET/etc/localtime" ]; then
- ln -sf /usr/share/zoneinfo/UTC "$TARGET/etc/localtime"
+ ln -sf /usr/share/zoneinfo/Etc/UTC "$TARGET/etc/localtime"
fi
if doing_variant fakechroot; then
The files have identical content; I don't know which choice is "better",
or if there is any difference.
@@ -137,15 +141,18 @@
info UNPACKREQ "Unpacking required packages..."
- exec 7>&1
-
smallyes '' |
(repeatn 5 in_target_failmsg UNPACK_REQ_FAIL_FIVE "Failure
while unpacking required packages. This will be attempted up to five times."
"" \
- dpkg --status-fd 8 --force-depends --unpack $(debfor $required)
8>&1 1>&7 || echo EXITCODE $?) |
- dpkg_progress $baseprog $bases UNPACKREQ "Unpacking required
packages" UNPACKING
+ dpkg --status-fd 8 --force-depends --unpack $(debfor $required)
8>&1 1>&7 |
+ dpkg_progress $baseprog $bases UNPACKREQ "Unpacking required
packages" UNPACKING) 7>&1
Seems like the gutsy script is either more or less robust here without
the || echo , not sure which. :)
The 7>&1 is the largest source of divergence. I don't see why the gutsy
script couldn't use the same one-time redirect that sid does. However,
I don't fully understand the FD dance going on here.
@@ -153,12 +160,21 @@
echo \"Warning: Fake start-stop-daemon called, doing nothing\"" >
"$TARGET/sbin/start-stop-daemon"
chmod 755 "$TARGET/sbin/start-stop-daemon"
+ if [ -x "$TARGET/sbin/initctl" ]; then
+ mv "$TARGET/sbin/initctl" "$TARGET/sbin/initctl.REAL"
+ echo \
+"#!/bin/sh
+echo
+echo \"Warning: Fake initctl called, doing nothing\"" > "$TARGET/sbin/initctl"
+ chmod 755 "$TARGET/sbin/initctl"
+ fi
If debian ever gets upstart in base, we could use that too, I guess
not needed yet. (Though it couldn't hurt to put it in..)
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
