Hi, I take the liberty of responding via the bugreports, as I see no need for > discretion in your post.
Fine +1 > > > > I did a NMU package to close 584653, could you give me permission about >> this? >> Moreover I think that bug 584663 is the same bug 584653, could you merge >> this into bts? >> > > Doing an NMU implies taking the responsibility of keeping an eye on the > NMUed package and take care of fixing potential collateral damage caused by > that NMU. > > Are you willing and feel competent to take that responsibility here? > > I am not, myself, willing to cherry-pick any more patches from upstream. > The pile is too big already, and some bugreports have emerged about > problems supposedly fixed by some of it but not working - most likely due to > missing some parts. > > Basically, the real work was done by Tim Waugh from redhat security Team, only I imported and adapted two patches from: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=ghostscript.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/ghostscript-8.71-14.fc14 In relation to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599564 To be more specific: ghostscript-SEARCH_HERE_FIRST.patch ghostscript--P-.patch Please check out: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.dsc Kind Regards, -- Julián Moreno Patiño Registered GNU Linux User ID 488513 PGP KEY ID 6168BF60
