user initscripts-ng-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org usertags 593987 + incorrect-runlevels thanks
This is caused by a change in how symlinks in runlevel 0 and 6 are treated. Before dependency based boot sequencing, start symlinks in those runlevels were silently treated like stop symlinks. With dependency based boot sequencing, all start symlinks in those runlevels were converted to stop symlinks to make their handling more predictable. This change to the LSB header should fix it: --- /etc/init.d/unattended-upgrades.orig 2010-10-25 08:48:28.000000000 +0200 +++ /etc/init.d/unattended-upgrades 2010-10-25 08:49:15.000000000 +0200 @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ # Required-Start: # Required-Stop: # Provides: unattended-upgrade-shutdown-check -# Default-Start: 0 6 -# Default-Stop: +# Default-Start: +# Default-Stop: 0 6 # Short-Description: Check if unattended upgrades are being applied # Description: Check if unattended upgrades are being applied # and wait for them to finish To ensure this change take effect on upgraded systems, code in the postinst could and should be added to change the start symlinks to stop symlinks in runlevel 0 and 6. See <URL: http://bugs.debian.org/548306 > for an example patch doing this for another package, by removing and reinserting all rc?.d/ symlinks during upgrades. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
