Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): > > Dear maintainer of qmail, > > On Sunday, September 12, 2010 I sent you a notice announcing my intent to > upload a > NMU of your package to fix its pending l10n issues, after an initial > notice sent on Tuesday, September 07, 2010. > > You either agreed for this NMU or did not respond to my notices. > > I will now upload this NMU to DELAYED/7-DAY.
Unfortunately, an infortunate sequence of events made that upload fail: - on Oct 7th, I uploaded to DELAYED/7-day a package signed with my C0143D2D key - on Oct 10th, my key was changed to my new key (a process I initiated quite a while ago) - on Oct 14th, the package reached incoming, but was rejected because of a wrong key - I wasn't notified of this (apparently, dak doesn't in such cases, which is logical in some way) Then I couldn't reupload that version as the package was still known by dak. So, finally, I decided to increment the version number and re-upload....which just happned. So, this NMu (with the exact diff I sent, is indeed 1.03-49.2 and not 1.03-49.1 Sorry for the trouble.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
