On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 21:56 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 20:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 09:29 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > Le mercredi 06 octobre 2010 à 08:12 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit : > > > > Does that mean libproxy will depend (as in Depends control field) on > > > > webkit ? That's going to be a problem later, because iceweasel 4.0 may > > > > use > > > > libproxy (I enabled it, but I'm not entirely sure I'll keep it that > > > > way). > > > > > > No. It doesn’t depend on libmozjs either, it uses whatever is available > > > on the system if it has been built against it. > > > > 0.3.1-2 does have a Recommends on libwebkit | libmozjs, however. > > Yes, it’s intentional. Do you think it is a problem?
No, I just remembered Mike mentioning having concerns about it. Given: > Note that I intend to work with libsoup upstreams to get rid of libproxy > for squeeze+1. I’d recommend against iceweasel using libproxy directly. however, that sounds like it shouldn't be a problem. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
