Hi, Le mardi 12 oct. 2010 à 19:06:00 (+0200), Thomas Preud'homme a écrit : > Le mardi 12 octobre 2010 01:07:57, Michael Rasmussen a écrit : > > Hi Thomas, > > > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:42:33 +0200 > > > > "Thomas Preud'homme" <thomas.preudho...@celest.fr> wrote: > > > do you still experience this bug since the upload of perl 5.10.1-12? > > > > In my Debian Lenny which was the version I reported the bug against - > > not Squeeze: > > $ dpkg -s perl > > Package: perl > > Status: install ok installed > > Priority: standard > > Section: perl > > Installed-Size: 18304 > > Maintainer: Brendan O'Dea <b...@debian.org> > > Architecture: amd64 > > Version: 5.10.0-19lenny2 > > > > So I guess this problem still persists? > My mistake, I though this version of perl was in lenny. If it's not a > production system, could you upgrade perl to the version in testing (and > downgrade after)?
Am I missing something or is this bug not related to dspam at all? The processes stated in the original bug report seems to concern spamassassin (spamd), but not dspam… Would you please confirm so that this bug can be reassigned accordingly? Cheers, Julien -- Julien Valroff <jul...@kirya.net> http://www.kirya.net GPG key: 1024D/9F71D449 17F4 93D8 746F F011 B845 9F91 210B F2AB 9F71 D449
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
