On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 18:39:40 +0100, Ben wrote in message <1286645980.2955.158.ca...@localhost>:
> On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 18:42 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > Package: linux-tools-2.6.36 > > Severity: normal > > > > > > ...dependency logic bug; experimental package > > linux-tools-$(experimental-kernel-version) should depend on either > > 1 of sid binutils, or on experimental binutils, not on both 2. > > I don't understand. The dependency is satisfied by sid's binutils: .._required_, yes, and this required dependency in your experimental linux-tools-2.6.36 breaks my satisfaction when we wanna experiment with experimental binutils, compilers etc on experimental kernel etc builds to help find real bugs. ;o) ..my suggestion is satisfy the dependency with "one of Sid's or Experimental's" binutils, or even "one or 2 or 3 or more", and not the current "Sid Only Basta!!!". .."if" my smoke tests crashes, I still get to keep the bits, so I can go "Oh Horror!!! Downgrade to Sid!!!". ;o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
