Arto Jantunen <vi...@debian.org> writes: > PAM was my first guess as well, but I don't have any concrete knowledge > about the sequence changes involved here (my understanding of PAM is > fairly superficial, and also outdated). Are you confident enough about > your theory to reassign this bug to PAM?
No... it's possible that the session module is not getting invoked for some reason. I think the key missing bit of information is what's different about your system, since I don't think this is happening to everyone. I think there must be something about your system that's tickling the bug, and that would probably point to the problem package. Do you have any unusual or non-default PAM configuration? Also, how are your supplemental groups managed; is it all in /etc/group, or are you using LDAP or some other system? -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
