"Jeffrey B. Green" wrote: > My assumption is that two forms said to be equivalent imply the results > of the forms are identical, they can be substituted for each other. > Otherwise, they not not equivalent, just similar. What is your > definition of equivalent?
But the man page doesn't just say "equivalent", it says "equivalent (as far as the above execution of cmd is concerned". And the whole paragraph is clearly just talking about the environment passed to an executed program. The evaluation of a command's arguments is all done as a separate thing. If you can think of some better wording which doesn't clutter it up and detract from the main point that is being made then I'll put it forward to upstream. Oliver -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
