Alex, can you test long calls? On my side everything looks good too, but after approximately one minute of phoning (sometimes more sometimes less) my system freezes.
I could not solve that problem yet, but I think I should file a separate bug for that. >> I could solve the TEI problem with a newer upstream version of vzaphfc. >> There is a version specially for dahdi 2.3.0. (A version for 2.4.0 is >> also available). > > Nice! > I can also confirm that the TEI problem can be solved by patching > dahdi-source 2.3.0.1+dfsg-1 zaphfc/base.c with upstream's r8=r9 branch > 2.3 (http://zaphfc.googlecode.com/svn). > >> But the kernel warning problem remains. Maybe dahdi 2.4.0 can solve that >> problem? > > In my case, it is even better than karl's report, as it also got rid of > the warn_slowpath_common. This has been tested on 2 different machines > (w/ and w/o shared irq), although with the same HFC card. I'm using > stock squeeze kernel package (linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 2.6.32-23). > > I can make & receive calls over the dahdi channels, so everything looks > good to me. I can even see the callerid being received properly in the > logs (although my dialplan needs more tweaking to handle the callerid > changes occurred since asterisk 1.2, but you don't care). > > I didn't try dahdi 2.4 or any other kernel version. I just want a > standard system I can forget and update without thinking too much... > > Smallish changes: > > $ diff /usr/src/modules/dahdi/drivers/dahdi/zaphfc/base.c > /usr/src/zaphfc-googlecode/branches/2.3/zaphfc/base.c > 34a35 >> #if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 32)) > 35a37 >> #endif > 659a662 >> hfccard->span.owner = THIS_MODULE; > 701c704 > < hfccard->sigchan = &hfccard->chans[D]; > --- >> hfccard->sigchan = &hfccard->chans[DAHDI_D]; > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
