Quoting Moritz Muehlenhoff (j...@inutil.org): > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 04:21:22PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > Quoting Jelmer Vernooij (jel...@debian.org): > > > > > > I forgot about openchange and evolution-mapi > > > > dependencies. Jelmer, any hint? Given that both these packages depend > > > > on an outdated version of samba4, that samba4 isn't in testing (I > > > > *hope* so, can't check right now), what do you prefer? > > > > > > > > - request removal of evolution-mapi and openchange from unstable > > > > - update samba4 in unstable with what we have in experimental > > > Since Samba 4 isn't in testing and I do think we should ship it in > > > squeeze+1 I think we should update the versions of samba4 and > > > openchange in sid. > > > > (your @debian.org address is still not working properly) > > > > OK. Will you do these uploads? > > Jelmer uploaded samba4 to unstable. I suppose this means that this > bug should instead deal with the removal of the now outdated samba4 > build in experimental.
Yes. Thanks for the notice (even if Jelmer apparently screwed with samba4 as it FTBFS..:-))
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
