On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:07:55 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 22:48 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > Please unblock package mednafen; the latest version in unstable fixes > > a memory leak. I'm attaching the full diff between 0.8.D-1 (the > > version currently in testing) and 0.8.D.3-1 (the version in unstable), > > I believe it's reasonably short and easy to read; the only changes are > > some assembly fixes (for Mac OS X), gcc-4.5 build fixes, the memory > > leak, and an added dependency on libjack-dev. > > Why is the libjack-dev build-dependency now necessary, when it > presumably wasn't before? (At least, earlier versions have built > successfully and nothing in the diff indicates a new use of jack).
It's not necessary, I simply noticed when rebuilding 0.8.D.2 that it was used if present (dpkg-buildpackage and pbuilder produced packages with different dependencies); since at the time I wasn't intending on requesting a freeze exception, I added an explicit build-dependency. Mednafen has actually supported jack since version 0.7.0! Should I remove the dependency? Regards, Stephen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
