On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 22:10 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xdotool.html claims: > > # out of date on kfreebsd-amd64: libxdo1 (from 1:1.20100318.2737-1) > # out of date on kfreebsd-i386: libxdo1 (from 1:1.20100318.2737-1)
It's not wrong: $ dak ls libxdo1 libxdo1 | 1:1.20100302.2708-1 | testing | amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libxdo1 | 1:1.20100318.2737-1 | unstable | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 The previous version of xdotool produced the libxdo1 binary package, the current version doesn't. The old binary packages need to be removed by ftp-master, which should happen during semi-automagic archive maintenance. > But http://packages.debian.org/sid/xdotool says (and is right): > > kfreebsd-amd64 1:2.20100701.2961-3 37,1 kB 92 kB > kfreebsd-i386 1:2.20100701.2961-3 35,1 kB 82 kB > > And this inconsistency is shown since approximately Friday afternoon > (CEST) when I updated xdotool to 1:2.20100701.2961-3 on my kfreebsd-i386 > box. packages.d.o shows the source version, and is therefore also correct. There's no inconsistency in both being correct and yet different. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
