On Sunday 26 September 2010 16:49:51 Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 19:54:40 +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > kdelibs5 was left in as a transitional package to help testingg > > migration when we split it in many pieces. We would like to get > > rid of it before release. It requires a couple of binNMUs. > > It doesn't seem reasonable to drop it before release, we should keep the > transitional package for a release IMO. On that note, I see that e.g. > libkdecore5 Replaces old kdelibs5 but doesn't have Breaks on it. That > seems to allow installing libkdecore5, then removing it, and having > dependencies on kdelibs5 still satisfied.
I guess we can keep the transitional package *if nothing* depends on it. Else it might just come back and bite us on the wheezy upgrade instead. It is just a matter of scheduling some binNMUs and nothing else. But we need a kde4libs upload anyways, so if the binNMUs are scheduled, I see no reasons to actually keep it. I assume that the toolchain issues and dpkg breakages that Adam mentioned almost two months ago have been sorted out. /Sune -- How to turn on the software? You neither should uninstall the password, nor must debug a provider, so that then from Outlook Express XP you neither must ping to the Fast wordprocessor over a controller of a cache to a memory on a tool, nor can digit on the pin on the URL, this way from the control drawer inside Photoshop you must remove the IRC driver on a PCI printer for exploring a prompt. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
