Hi release team, Am Donnerstag, den 23.09.2010, 18:47 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose: > On 23.09.2010 16:51, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Hi Matthias, > > > > Am Donnerstag, den 23.09.2010, 14:58 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose: > >> Package: haskell-llvm > >> Version: 0.8.0.2-2 > >> Tags: patch > >> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > >> Usertags: origin-ubuntu maverick ubuntu-patch > >> > >> starting with llvm-2.7, the llvm package builds a shared llvm library. > >> please > >> link against it instead of using the static libs. > >> > >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/56278593/haskell-llvm_0.8.0.2-2_0.8.0.2-2ubuntu1.diff.gz > > > > just making sure: This is not something that needs to be done for > > sequeeze, right? Or is this part of a something release-goalish? > > As you like it. To get llvm fixes, you would have to monitor llvm-2.7 uploads > and decide if you rebuild. with the shared library you'll get them "for > free".
what is your preference: A freeze exception for such a change, or keeping up the freeze and having a statically linked package in squeeze? Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
