Am 22.09.2010 14:53, Julien Cristau schrieb: > So there's something I'm not sure I understand here. AFAIK, we're > shipping motif because some closed apps need it. How does that work if > we get rid of libXm.so.3? Or did I misunderstand the point of those > packages?
Apps have to be recompiled if the users decide to replace libXm.so.3 by libXm.so.4 > Another concern is that the shared library packages contains a lot of > non-versioned files. Those should be in a separate package so that > different ABI versions are co-installable. Especially wtf at a shared > lib package including files in /usr/include. I put that on my todo list for the next release. thanks for the input. Stefan -- Stefan Bauer ----------------------------------------- PGP: 36D1 1570 DCAD B767 EABE F60D 6BCA 7AD4 79EB C4EC -------- plzk.de - Linux - because it works ---------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
