severity 593933 serious thanks Mark Purcell wrote: > On Monday 20 September 2010 22:05:11 Emil Langrock wrote: > > I see it the same way, but I would say that this is a kind of FTBFS and > > thus it must have the severity serious. > > kmymoney 4.5 does not FTFBS: > https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=kmymoney;ver=4.5-1
If I build it in a pbuilder then I get functionality wise a complete different binary then the thing which is provided by you on amd64. See for example https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=kmymoney;ver=4.5-1;arch=armel;stamp=1282445711 please search for "KBanking plugin" and look on the line if it says no or yes. So either the source is missing (not the case) or it is a ftbfs on amd64 due to completely different build results. I will increase the severity again. > Thus the severity is not series. > > I agree that kmymoney should be built with aqbanking5, however this is an > experimental package, thus I am assigning severity wishlist for the build > against aqbanking5. > > I also suspect the patches to build against aqbanking5 should be forwarded > upstream as they are not Debian specific. The patch is definitely debian specific as they change the stuff in debian/ How you fix it to get the same results when building is not my problem - I just provided the stuff I did. If it is enough to depend on pkg-config then try it - I wont do your work because I am not the package maintainer with the expertise to fix that stuff. If the pkg-config is enough then please feel free to degrease the severity again to whishlist. -- Emil Langrock -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
