2010/9/16 Michel Dänzer <daen...@debian.org>: > I'm leaning towards considering libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev shipping libGL.a a > mistake rather than libgl1-mesa-dev not shipping one.
Why, may I ask? Because there are multiple implementations of libGL? > The downside is that the wrapper becomes specific to the libGL linked > statically, whereas a dlopen based wrapper would work with any libGL > conforming to the libGL ABI. Surely the stub generation can be automated > at least to some degree, maybe the Mesa glapi scripts can be (ab)used > for that. Yes, I did end up writing a stub generator, since I was planning to for the final project anyway. Having the static library would simply have been more convenient for development & testing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
