On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 22:04 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hello, > > Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 23:15 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > 2. the second is a debian-installer kernel. > > > I copied the kernel and initrd from a debian-installer netinst cd > > > (the same cd which was used to perform the test installation, leading > > > to this bugreport #571035, an debian-testing daily build from > > > 23. Aug 2010. > > > That kernel boots fine!!! > > > > So what's the version of that kernel (from /proc/version)? > > ~ # cat /proc/version > Linux version 2.6.32-5-486 (Debian 2.6.32-15) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc > version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-1) ) #1 Tue Jun 1 04:27:25 UTC 2010 > > Be aware, that this is a debian-installer kernel (booting that kernel brings > up the debian installation process). That might have another config?
d-i uses the kernel and modules from a regular kernel package, only divided between multiple packages to reduce memory and network usage. So this seems to be a regression between 2.6.32-15 (used in the installer) and 2.6.32-20 (current version in testing on 25th August, and presumably what it installed). Unfortunately I can't see any changes between these versions which might be responsible. Could you try testing the intermediate versions, which should still be available from <http://snapshot.debian.org/binary/linux-image-2.6.32-5-486/>? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
