Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> writes: > On Thu, 02 Sep 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I believe this is true of all binary relationship fields and all build >> relationship fields as well. The dpkg-dev tools unfold all of those >> fields when generating *.dsc, *.changes, and DEBIAN/control files, and >> parers of those generated files do not have to cope with folded fields >> (and I believe are known *not* to be able to cope with folded fields in >> some cases). We should say that explicitly. > Just a minor remark: we modified policy not so long ago to allow the > Binary field to be folded even in .dsc and .changes. > So your assertion is not always true. I don't see any contradiction between what you said and what I said, so I'm not sure what assertion you're disagreeing with. The Binary field is not a binary or build relationship field. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
