On 2010-09-04 03:16, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Yes, this is a serious issue - we are still seeing new bug reports on > the obsolete 2.6.32-trunk kernel packages, and this seems to be the > reason.
But knowing these issues, was it really neccessary to reintroduce packages with a "trunk" abiversion? (*-2.6.35-trunk-* in experimental?) Wouldn't something like "0trunk" trivially sort before (i.e. older than) "1"? Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
