severity 595269 grave thanks On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 06:05:02PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.11.2-4 > Severity: normal > > > Given: my daily Debian/unstable Q/A build, dnsmasq running on host, > Debian/unstable chroot trying to download stuff -> resolving DNS > > Problem: when upgrading to 2.11.2-4 the chroot can't resolve any > dns entries through dnsmasq any longer without an resolve.conf entry > to resolv.conf > > Workaround: adding "nameserver 127.0.0.1" to resolv.conf > or downgrading to libc <=2.11.2-2 > > Note: a similar problem existed in the past already: #551879 - > though - at least AFAICS - doesn't seem to be the same issue as I've > an /etc/hosts file in my chroot. > > Full Details: > > # cat /etc/resolv.conf > # Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by > resolvconf(8) > # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN > > # ping -c 1 debian.org > ping: unknown host debian.org > > # echo "nameserver 127.0.0.1" >> /etc/resolvconf/run/resolv.conf > > # ping -c 1 debian.org > PING debian.org (194.109.137.218) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from klecker.debian.org (194.109.137.218): icmp_req=1 ttl=56 > time=13.9 ms > > --- debian.org ping statistics --- > 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 13.952/13.952/13.952/0.000 ms > > Downgrading to libc 2.11.2-2: > > # apt-get install libc6=2.11.2-2 libc-bin=2.11.2-2 > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Suggested packages: > glibc-doc > The following packages will be DOWNGRADED: > libc-bin libc6 > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 downgraded, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. > Need to get 5,004kB of archives. > After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used. > Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y > Get:1 http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20100829/ sid/main libc-bin > amd64 2.11.2-2 [744kB] > Get:2 http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20100829/ sid/main libc6 > amd64 2.11.2-2 [4,259kB] > Fetched 5,004kB in 7s (671kB/s) > Preconfiguring packages ... > Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) > dpkg: warning: downgrading libc-bin from 2.11.2-4 to 2.11.2-2. > (Reading database ... 36473 files and directories currently installed.) > Preparing to replace libc-bin 2.11.2-4 (using > .../libc-bin_2.11.2-2_amd64.deb) ... > Unpacking replacement libc-bin ... > Processing triggers for man-db ... > Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) > Setting up libc-bin (2.11.2-2) ... > [...] > > Works again with 2.11.2-2: > > # cat /etc/resolv.conf > # Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by > resolvconf(8) > # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN > nameserver 127.0.0.1 > > # ping -c 1 debian.org > PING debian.org (128.31.0.51) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from senfl.debian.org (128.31.0.51): icmp_req=1 ttl=48 time=100 ms > > --- debian.org ping statistics --- > 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 100.675/100.675/100.675/0.000 ms > > # sed -i "/nameserver 127.0.0.1/d" /etc/resolvconf/run/resolv.conf > > # cat /etc/resolv.conf > # Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by > resolvconf(8) > # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN > > # ping -c 1 debian.org > PING debian.org (194.109.137.218) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from klecker.debian.org (194.109.137.218): icmp_req=1 ttl=56 > time=13.7 ms > > --- debian.org ping statistics --- > 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 13.747/13.747/13.747/0.000 ms > > > If you need any further information, testing,... please let me know. > Leaving severity of this bugreport up to the maintainers, though if > the release is supposed to enter squeeze I think this bug could > qualify for RC. >
This has be triggered by: | * Replace any/submitted-etc-resolv.conf.diff by upstream version | patches/any/cvs-etc-resolv.conf.diff. After all this time, I should I have learned to not trust upstream. I just wanted to avoid diverging too much from upstream, but it is actually sane doing that. I agree with you this is indeed RC. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org