On Mon, Aug 30, 2010, Clint Adams wrote: > I do not think this is a good idea. Does anyone else agree with Marek?
I don't think it's a good idea either; in Linaro, we introduced an u-boot-linaro source which has tons of binary packages, but it's full of ugly names and it's too many packages for a very small amount of data. The general direction we should be going to is more commonality across ARM devices, not more hair-splitting :-) Just like the kernel is able to build a single zImage which works on a bunch of boards, we should aim at making that possible in u-boot starting by a single package with binaries for multiple boards, and perhaps going into a single u-boot binary working on more than a single board, perhaps all boards with the same SoC. -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
