On onsdagen den 25 augusti 2010, you stated the following: > Hello, > > The recently released upstream version 1.0.28 of SSVNC should fix this bug:
It's just this patch, right? --- ssvnc-1.0.27/vnc_unixsrc/vncviewer/rfbproto.c 2010-04-18 04:34:38.000000000 +0200 +++ ssvnc-1.0.28/vnc_unixsrc/vncviewer/rfbproto.c 2010-06-04 03:20:39.000000000 +0200 @@ -854,7 +854,9 @@ switch (secType) { case rfbSecTypeNone: fprintf(stderr, "No VNC authentication needed\n"); - if (viewer_minor >= 8) { + if (accept_uvnc) { + ; /* we pretended 3.16 etc. */ + } else if (viewer_minor >= 8) { CARD32 authResult; if (!ReadFromRFBServer((char *)&authResult, 4)) { -- Magnus Holmgren holmg...@debian.org Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.