Package: debian-faq
Version: 4.0.4+nmu1
Severity: important

New apt is as good as aptitude in many respect.  So I think following
needs updates.
  http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/ch-pkgtools.en.html#s-aptitude

Please read thread:
  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=411280

As I recently checked, hold in aptitude is the same as one offered by
dpkg.  So completely compatible and equivalent these das.

My summary of package comparison is at:
  
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch02.en.html#_literal_apt_get_literal_literal_apt_cache_literal_vs_literal_aptitude_literal

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

debian-faq depends on no packages.

debian-faq recommends no packages.

Versions of packages debian-faq suggests:
ii  chromium-browser [w 5.0.375.127~r55887-1 Chromium browser
ii  epiphany-browser [w 2.30.3-1             Intuitive GNOME web browser
ii  evince [postscript- 2.30.3-1             Document (postscript, pdf) viewer
ii  ghostscript [postsc 8.71~dfsg2-6         The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF
ii  iceweasel [www-brow 3.5.11-2             Web browser based on Firefox
ii  w3m [www-browser]   0.5.2-9              WWW browsable pager with excellent

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to