On Mi, 25 Aug 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Yeah, this is definitely the plan. As you've noticed, we also need to
> handle libglx, and the other packages should cooperate and set up the
> alternatives so that we don't have to do the current diversion trick, and
Hmm, that means:
xserver-xorg-core for libglx.so
libgl1-mesa-glx for libGL.so.1
libgl1-mesa-dev for libGL.so
Sounds like a more long-term plan to convince xserver-xorg-core ...
Anyway, I will follow that dev closely, but still keep my intel-nvidia
switcher script current so that it does not break.
Best wishes
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining prein...@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OZARK (n.)
One who offers to help just after all the work has been done.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
