On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:34:08PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > > "nmap reports the service jetdirect for port 9102. This is wrong. It > should report Bacula File Daemon. The port 9102 is officially assigned > to Bacula File Daemon."
That may be the official assignment, but the sad reality is that my HP printer (purchased this year) still has jetdirect listening on: 9100/tcp open jetdirect 9101/tcp open jetdirect 9102/tcp open jetdirect I'll bet there are more HP printers doing this than there are Bacula installations :(. It would be great if HP would get their own proper port assignments. Otherwise, maybe Bacula can apply for a new port number which hasn't been inappropriately commandeered by HP? Normally we would suggest adding a version detection signature for Bacula so that it can be distinguished from Jetdirect, but 9100-9107 is the one port range for which we don't do version detection by default since Jetdirect is so broken :(. I have added a comment on Bacula to the 9102 entry for what little that is worth. Cheers, Fyodor -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
