Julien Cristau writes: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 16:30:56 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:44:58AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 15:42:24 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > > > +# Make sure dpkg knows about bg-en.rws too, otherwise the file is > > > > not +# deleted upon remove/purge. > > > > + >debian/aspell-bg/var/lib/aspell/bg-en.rws > > > > > > Shipping such a file in the package means it'll get emptied every time > > > the package in re-installed or upgraded. That sounds wrong. > > > > Yes, but I don't know why you think it's wrong. These files are > > supposed to be regenerated in postinst by update-dictcommon-aspell; > > that's a feature. AFAIK all other aspell packages work in a similar > > way. Here, bg-en.rws should be treated exactly as bg.rws. > > Then why is it shipped in the package? Is it just so that dpkg removes > it automatically?
I agree, that 'automatically removed by dpkg' games are best to be avoided for regenerated files, and it is saner to remove them in the postrm, since now debsums aspell-bg lists these three regenerated files as FAILED, which is to be expected. I failed to catch that, so sorry for the noise and thank you for the sharp eye on it. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
