Hi Miguel, Am 18.08.2010 00:09, schrieb Miguel Landaeta: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 02:55:41PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: >> Okay, I have checked the issue again. The JSR 170 source code seems to >> be available from >> <http://www.day.com/day/en/products/jcr/jsr-170.html> under the >> Apache-2.0 license. Wouldn't that solve the license problem? > > I could not find any source code licensed under Apache-2.0 > license in that website. The same happens with JSR 283 spec.
where did you look? Just download <http://www.day.com/content/dam/day/downloads/jcr-ri-1.0.zip>. The link can be found at the page mentioned above. The file ships the text of the Apache-2.0 license in the file licenses/day-ri-license.txt. There is an additional restriction regarding derivative work that sounds harmless to me: (1) Cause the Derivative Work to fully implement the Specification(s), or later revisions of the Specification(s) that are acknowledged by the Specification Lead as successors to the Specification(s), without modifying, subsetting, supersetting, or otherwise extending the Restricted Name Space or including any public or protected packages, classes, Java interfaces, fields, or methods within the Restricted Name Space other than those required/authorized by the Specification(s) being implemented, and pass the TCK for such Specification(s); or (2) Make no claims that the Derivative Work complies with the Specification(s) and remove any such claims from the Derivative Work that originated with the Work. We can simply choose (2). Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
