On 08/16/2010 01:23 AM, Marcos Talau wrote: > Upstream said: >> The offending piece of code was identified. However the code, due >> to its non-POSIX implementation, is non-functional under current >> versions of GLIBC, regardless the bug. Squid has a similar kludge >> but, apparently, they managed to keep it working. >> >> A portable solution is being investigated, but there's a real >> possibility NameServers functionality will be removed. >> >> In the meantime, for the affected OSes, I suggest disabing the code >> and issuing a warning if that option is enabled by the user.
Could you provide a patch that issues a warning when the NameServers functionnality is used? I'm still undecided on what I should do with my NMU. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
