On 13/08/10 at 13:02 +0200, Sylvain Joyeux wrote: > Package: rubygems1.9.1 > Version: 1.3.7-1 > Severity: normal > > >From the comments in the redmine thread above, rubygems for 1.9.x should be > taken from the Ruby sources, not the standalone rubygems project anymore. > > Unfortunately, since ruby1.9.1~1.9.2 has been pushed to testing, not > only there is currently no way to get a working rubygems for 1.9.x > on Debian, but that is going to be the case for squeeze as well > until it gets fixed. > > Would not it be possible that the ruby maintainers simply install > the rubygems version from Ruby itself and conflict: with > rubygems1.9.1 ?
I think that the appropriate course of action would be to get rubygems fixed so that it works with 1.9.1. I don't think that having several rubygems codebases in the archive is really a solution. I'm currently on vacation, so could you talk to the upstream rubygems developers about that? - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
