Markus Hoenicka wrote: > The only thing that worries > me is that the big green download button displays 0.8.3 instead of > 0.8.3-1, but this is beyond our control afaik.
Which is exactly why I missed it. Sorry. I believe I wouldn't be the only one doing that mistake though. I don't get why you say you have no control over it. Is it because sourceforge is taking what it believes is the last version? In that case, that might be your naming scheme that is creating it. >> What would be best would be to use 0.8.3, then if >> you have a bugfix release use 0.8.3.1, which is >> bigger than just 0.8.3. Or even better, just have >> the first release called 0.8.3.0 so that it >> confuses no one. > > Fair enough. I'll try and follow this naming convention for future > releases. Cool! > Not yet. The code is in CVS. We're currently fiddling with a new test > suite and a showstopper bug in firebird, which probably won't allow us > to offer the firebird driver as one of the fully supported core drivers. What issue does the 0.9.0 fixes? Does it brings new features, as its version number may let users believe? FYI: I have send a version to the same FTP location: http://ftparchive.gplhost.com/pub/libdbi/ Again, as I said, I'd be happy if anyone could test it. If you require a Debian virtual machine, just let you know, and I'll setup one for you for a week or to, so you can make sure that each individual component is running as expected. Thanks again for the very good upstream support that you are giving here, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
