On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:08:26PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:14:45AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Joey Hess writes:
> > >    altgcc
> > 
> > I didn't realize that this one still does exist. Please remove it from
> > unstable.
> 
> A number of libc5 related packages still depend on it though, and
> should be removed together.
> 
> ld.so: The Linux dynamic linker and library for libc4 and libc5. 
> libc: libc5
> libdb: libdb1
> libg++27: The GNU C++ libraries (libc5 version) 
> regex: libc5 version of regex libs
> termcap-compat: Compatibility package for old termcap-based programs.
> 
> 
> What do you think of this? Based on popcon stats libc5, it's hard to
> say whether it's still really used, though I think it's pushing things
> to still ship this stuff with etch.
> 

I already proposed to remove the whole libc5 chaintools and
dependencies before woody release. A few users complained because of a 
few old commercial programs (such as wordperfect and so)
which depends yet on it. I asked on d-d at that time. Probably a survey
could be conducted on d-u (I'm not subscribed) to know general
suggestions by our users. I still have the same opinion, the old
chaintool is now and always a pain to compile with every new release 
of the current one, and has a good deal of bugs.

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to