Hi John, On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 23:25 -0700, John Wright wrote: > On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:24:24PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 01:40 -0700, John Wright wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:45:07PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > > > Attached patch updates the changelog as well and removes the conflict > > > > with older versions of apt. > > > Thanks - how about this one? It's a little simpler since the only thing > > > we use apt_pkg for in deb822 is TagFile. > > Nice, I hadn't thought of that. > > > > > Also...are you just using the deb822 module on its own? There are > > > plenty of dependencies in python-debian that aren't satisfiable in > > > Dapper. Also, I just added a feature that depends on UnicodeWarning > > > being available, but that's only in python2.5. Thinking about it, > > > though, it's better to make a new warning class anyway, hence the second > > > patch. With both patches, I think at least deb822 should work fine in a > > > Dapper environment. > > We're using Python2.5 on Hardy at the moment, and will hopefully be > > switching to the next LTS (Lucid) in a couple of months. Sorry if I said > > dapper. > Ah, ok. I'm rethinking the second patch - UnicodeWarning, according to > the Python documentation, is actually intended as a base category for > unicode related warnings, which this is...and if you don't need > python2.4 support, there's no need to rip it out. (The "What's new in > Python 2.5" document suggested that the warning was intended for a very > specific problem, but the warning categories documentation makes it seem > more general.) Ok, I'll leave that alone for now. We only care about >= 2.5 support.
> > > Shall I commit? > > Please do, thanks! > Ok, no problem. :) Thanks! Cheers, Jelmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part