Hi maintainer of poppler, This is intent to NMU mail.
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:42:02AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 00:08:50 +0900 Osamu Aoki wrote: > I don't think we should risk waiting on the maintainer since if it > takes too much longer xpdf will not get in squeeze. Let's wait for a day or so at least ... (I hope this freeze is not as long as old ones but usually, we have time.) > > Also why do half-job when we see: > > > > I retitled following bug and set to normal. > > Debian Bug report logs - #558021 > > poppler-utils: should use versioned Conflicts: with xpdf-reader > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=558021 > > This isn't release critical, so it shouldn't be touched by an NMU. It > can of course be fixed by the maintainer, but I really don't think we > should touch it. True. ... My patch is meant for maintainer to use for their bug fix upload. > I think this would also solve the problem, but again if we're trying to > follow good policy/procedure and make minimal (low risk) changes in > NMU's, then I say we should stick with my one-line patch. I think the > policy says Breaks are recommended; that doesn't mean Conflicts are > not allowed. Point taken. If we do not hear from poppler maintainers, I will make NMU with your patch. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
