severity 589707 important
tags 589707 + unreproducible
thanks

On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:51:03 +0000
ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:

> retitle 589707 Running mono apps can prevent upgrade from working
> thanks
> 
> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 11:50 +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> > I don't think you've installed it fully - mono-gac should never be
> > marked as pn.
> > 
> > Are you sure mono-runtime is installed?
> 
> Yes, it was installed. The reason for that status was that no
> mono-related packages could be fully installed, they all crashed at
> some point during the installation.
> 
> However, I found the reason: I had Tomboy running. Ripping out all
> mono-related packages, killing the tomboy process, and reinstalling,
> allowed mono to work again.
> 
> Apparently, some mono upgrades require that all processes running
> under an old runtime version be stopped. Retitling accordingly. No
> idea how to detect or fix something like this – the only reason I
> have mono installed is because of Tomboy.

I just upgraded from Mono 2.6.3 to 2.6.7 while having a plenty of Mono
applications running (like Smuxi, Tomboy, Banshee, etc) and had no
issues with starting new applications nor with the currently running
ones.

I believe though that the .wapi stuff could be related. Have you used
fakeroot or something that fiddles with HOME? as that can pretty badly
break Mono, see:
http://pkg-mono.alioth.debian.org/cli-policy/ch-mono.html#s-mono-disable-shm

As I can't reproduce this issue I am setting severity to important for
now.

PS: please don't use -qu...@b.d.o next time, I had to copy my reply
from the webinterface of the BTS...
-- 
Regards,

Mirco 'meebey' Bauer

PGP-Key ID: 0xEEF946C8

FOSS Developer    mee...@meebey.net  http://www.meebey.net/
PEAR Developer    mee...@php.net     http://pear.php.net/
Debian Developer  mee...@debian.org  http://www.debian.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to