Hi! Please have a look at bug #222232.
I think that a good way of solving this problem is that if cruft could filter a list of "missing" files through localepurge (executed with some special command line option), and localepurge would filter from this stream the names of files which it had deleted (or, for that matter, which it would have deleted). This way cruft could learn about which files were "legitimately" deleted from the system by localepurge, and only pass to the user what localepurge doesn't claim to have taken care of. What do you think about this? Would it be possible to implement in localepurge? This would be a decently generic way of dealing with such problems from cruft's point of view. If it would not be possible, maybe you have a different idea on how this could be solved? regards Marcin -- Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://marcin.owsiany.pl/ GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75 D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
