Clint Byrum wrote: > That said, I'm keenly interested in seeing libdbi flourish, as it seems > like there are a number of cool packages making use of it that sit inside > my own sphere of interest.
I have no particular interest in libdbi myself, I only did its packaging because I am maintaining libapache2-mod-log-sql which has a dependency for libdbi. I don't even use it myself, which makes me a very bad tester. That being said, this is the only library that I maintain, and I have technical interest in maintaining a library (I want to make sure I'm up-to-date with knowledge of it). What packages are you using that also use libdbi? > I would be more than thrilled to take on > maintenance of libdbi in Debian, as I'd like to go down the path toward > DD status. Maybe we could work together on it then, and make you the official maintainer of libdbi, while I'll be doing only sponsorship, and continue to learn. If you want to do this way, then I can push an RFA, you'll adopt the package, and we'll maintain together. Does this sounds like a good plan for you? > As far as my reasons for wanting v0.8.3, I haven't reported this bug > yet, because I haven't tried it on Debian specifically (installing a > base squeeze vm right now to do just that), but there is actually a > problem with using rrdtool 1.4 and libdbi 0.8.2, that causes an abort. > Its most likely due to the age of 0.8.2 and the fact that the rrdtool > authors developed and tested using 0.8.3. I didn't now rrdtool was making use of libdbi. Can you explain to me when it does? > Your time and attention to the package are also quite appreciated. Thanks! Well, I didn't even have time to review your patch yet! :) Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
