Package: latex2html Version: 2008-debian1-1 Severity: minor Hi,
Does latex2html actually depend on perl-doc to function properly? Can we make the perl-doc a recommendation instead of dependency please? I hope the my minimum build system doesn't have unnecessary package if possible. Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (360, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.33-grml64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages latex2html depends on: ii ghostscript-x 8.71~dfsg-4 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF ii netpbm 2:10.0-12.1+squeeze1 Graphics conversion tools between ii perl 5.10.1-12 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-doc 5.10.1-12 Perl documentation ii texlive-binaries [t 2009-6 Binaries for TeX Live ii texlive-fonts-recom 2009-9 TeX Live: Recommended fonts ii texlive-latex-extra 2009-7 TeX Live: LaTeX supplementary pack ii texlive-latex-recom 2009-9 TeX Live: LaTeX recommended packag latex2html recommends no packages. latex2html suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
