[Goswin von Brederlow] > Only when the scripts do have the right dependencies. And they not > always do.
Of course. And buggy packages will give their users problems which hopefully will be reported and fixed by its maintainer. > For example chrony depends only on $local_fs instead of $remote_fs > and could be scheduled in parallel with sendsigs. I see #590888 is reported (thought its suggestion regarding networking should probably be changed to $network), so this seem to work. > People do get the depends wrong and it would be nice to have an > extra level of protection for sendsigs. This is another way to say that the boot system should hide bugs in packages, and I believe this to be a bad idea. > The reason why I looked into this is that with ubuntus half > conversion to upstart sendsigs does run in parallel with other > scripts and happily kills them. And I wondered how well Debian is > protected from that. Right. Suspect we will have similar problems that need to be fixed. :) Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
